|
|
Post by sick2b on Mar 27, 2019 18:24:27 GMT -6
Can someone be simultaneously (say, in the top 95% by most standards) super beautiful, super bright and super benevolent ?
Or only a max of two Bs (e.g. super beautiful and super bright, but not super benevolent; super bright and super benevolent, but not super beautiful; etc.) is possible?
|
|
|
|
Post by neader on Mar 27, 2019 18:32:13 GMT -6
Um, yes.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewvb on Mar 27, 2019 18:35:36 GMT -6
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2019 18:35:36 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by dij22 on Mar 27, 2019 18:50:43 GMT -6
Yes, but what is the most/least desirable combo?
Jon Hamm in 30 Rock?
Jon Hamm in Mad Men?
|
|
|
|
Post by goodson on Mar 27, 2019 19:23:19 GMT -6
yeah it's me
|
|
|
|
Post by thebosma on Mar 27, 2019 19:26:07 GMT -6
Yes, but what is the most/least desirable combo? Jon Hamm in 30 Rock? Jon Hamm in Mad Men? Pre or post hooks? |
|
|
|
Post by sick2b on Mar 27, 2019 19:48:54 GMT -6
I guess that is exactly why there is a third possible answer  |
|
|
|
Post by sick2b on Mar 27, 2019 19:55:52 GMT -6
My bestie is convinced that a true triple BBB is like a unicorn - because, say, someone how is supermodel beautiful and very intelligent too, is usually full of him/herself. And that someone who isn't handsome/pretty but intelligent, will also want to be super kind to help him/herself on the dating front.
I tend to disagree or at least see this a gradation (and believe each of these three is somewhat relative to start with)
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewvb on Mar 27, 2019 20:15:24 GMT -6
I guess that is exactly why there is a third possible answer savage |
|
|
|
Post by andrewvb on Mar 27, 2019 20:16:48 GMT -6
My bestie is convinced that a true triple BBB is like a unicorn - because, say, someone how is supermodel beautiful and very intelligent too, is usually full of him/herself. And that someone who isn't handsome/pretty but intelligent, will also want to be super kind to help him/herself on the dating front. I tend to disagree or at least see this a gradation (and believe each of these three is somewhat relative to start with) so much to unpack here but i appreciate that you and your friends have conversations as if you're on a tv show |
|
|
|
Post by Tweet on Mar 27, 2019 20:32:27 GMT -6
I was really hoping this was gonna be a thread about Big Baller Brand and this tattoo:  |
|
|
|
Post by doctorace on Mar 27, 2019 20:33:16 GMT -6
I don't event want to say what I thought when I saw BBB
|
|
|
|
Post by thebosma on Mar 27, 2019 22:32:36 GMT -6
I asked my friend this question and he asked me if I’ve been watching The View
|
|
|
|
Post by sick2b on Mar 28, 2019 5:19:39 GMT -6
I guess that is exactly why there is a third possible answer savage At least I never pretended to be nice.. |
|
|
|
Post by sick2b on Mar 28, 2019 5:30:58 GMT -6
I guess that is exactly why there is a third possible answer savage Also btw, the word "savage" is offensive, deragotary and highly inappropriate... even more so when addressed to someone whose Dad comes from a country that was often described as so by US media |
|
|
|
Post by sick2b on Mar 28, 2019 5:34:19 GMT -6
Ok guys, I just wanted to throw something lighter and (especially) sillier in here, especially given all the heavy conversations going around across all threads. But looks like I epically failed  |
|
|
|
Post by claypoolfan on Mar 28, 2019 7:04:29 GMT -6
I was also enthusiastic to talk about Lonzo Ball but then I just got a headache.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tweet on Mar 28, 2019 7:07:17 GMT -6
I was also enthusiastic to talk about Lonzo Ball but then I just got a headache. Let’s rectify the situation: is that the worse tattoo ever? |
|
|
|
Post by goodson on Mar 28, 2019 7:07:41 GMT -6
alright fuck this
i'm out y'all you have my number
|
|
|
|
Post by claypoolfan on Mar 28, 2019 7:12:09 GMT -6
I was also enthusiastic to talk about Lonzo Ball but then I just got a headache. Let’s rectify the situation: is that the worse tattoo ever? I follow some bad tattoo accounts on Insta and have seen MUCH MUCH MUCH worse, but this might be the worst tattoo that a celebrity has. Especially given he was like "check out my new awesome tattoo". Like, even the numbers on it are bad. At least have it showing 7 or 11. |
|
|
|
Post by Tweet on Mar 28, 2019 8:27:23 GMT -6
Let’s rectify the situation: is that the worse tattoo ever? I follow some bad tattoo accounts on Insta and have seen MUCH MUCH MUCH worse, but this might be the worst tattoo that a celebrity has. Especially given he was like "check out my new awesome tattoo". Like, even the numbers on it are bad. At least have it showing 7 or 11. I think I agree. Also, here's a semi-related Mitch Hedberg joke: |
|
|
|
Post by facts on Mar 29, 2019 7:06:44 GMT -6
I was away last week and just reading this now. How do you measure intelligence? You could probably crowdsource measure beauty by what the 95th percentile is on what people find attractive, but that is knowingly subjective. Intelligence shouldn't be subjective, but all of the known ways to measure are flawed.
|
|
|
|
Post by sick2b on Mar 29, 2019 12:11:38 GMT -6
I was away last week and just reading this now. How do you measure intelligence? You could probably crowdsource measure beauty by what the 95th percentile is on what people find attractive, but that is knowingly subjective. Intelligence shouldn't be subjective, but all of the known ways to measure are flawed. How about asking 20 people who knows that one person how they would rate him/her on a 1-100 intelligence scale (where this person's intelligence would put him/her on a 100-people sample if 1 was the dumbest and 100 the brightest of the lot)? And then seeing it the person gets 95% or even 90% or higher (ditto for beauty)? Then it would bundle up and thus average out those who value IQ score, other who would rank general knowledge higher, the ones who say memory, a quick wit or even streetsmartness is what matters most, etc, etc |
|
|
|
Post by Xamnam on Mar 29, 2019 12:15:10 GMT -6
Could happen, sure, infinite monkeys, will happen, beauty is subjective to the point of meaninglessness.
|
|
|
|
Post by sick2b on Mar 29, 2019 12:29:36 GMT -6
Could happen, sure, infinite monkeys, will happen, beauty is subjective to the point of meaninglessness. Yet, put 20 random people in a room for 48h, and with among them say a supermodel, a well-rounded Nobel Prize winner, and someone who has zero inch of nastiness in him/her together in a room, and ask them at the end, through anonymous forms, to identify the brightest, nicest, and prettiest of them and I bet that in each case one would stick out and come ahead by a margin |
|
|
|
Post by Xamnam on Mar 29, 2019 12:32:23 GMT -6
Could happen, sure, infinite monkeys, will happen, beauty is subjective to the point of meaninglessness. Yet, put 20 random people in a room for 48h, and with among them say a supermodel, a well-rounded Nobel Prize winner, and someone who has zero inch of nastiness in him/her together in a room, and ask them at the end, through anonymous forms, to identify the brightest, nicest, and prettiest of them and I bet that in each case one would stick out and come ahead by a margin 18/20 is under 95%. And your question was about people who could potentially be all three, not wildly disparate contenders |
|
|
|
Post by sick2b on Mar 29, 2019 12:33:40 GMT -6
Re beauty I think that many more people are cute than beautiful (though research has shown that there are universal standards.. e.g. symmetric face, golden ratio in face -nose vs lips, etc. and body no matter if thin or curvy, etc.)
Also, I for sure would not want to ever date a supermodel, nor really a Nobel prize either, and much prefer generally well-rounded people
|
|
|
|
Post by thebosma on Mar 29, 2019 12:37:36 GMT -6
I mean, I think both a supermodel and a Nobel prize winner have the ability to be super well rounded
|
|
|
|
Post by sthubbins on Mar 29, 2019 12:40:09 GMT -6
true BBBs
1. Amal Clooney
2. Colby from Jeopardy
3. Kesha
4. Santa Claus
5. Jimmy Carter
|
|
