|
|
Post by Tweet on Jul 26, 2021 21:24:27 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by mookie on Jul 26, 2021 22:01:56 GMT -6
Beatles and it’s not even remotely close
|
|
|
|
Post by chvrchbarrel on Jul 26, 2021 22:12:48 GMT -6
the beatles wrote better songs but the stones did everything else better
so i went with the beatles
|
|
|
|
Post by ultravisitor on Jul 26, 2021 22:13:21 GMT -6
The Beatles.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tweet on Jul 26, 2021 22:17:26 GMT -6
the beatles wrote better songs but the stones did everything else better so i went with the beatles This is exactly it for me tbh |
|
|
|
Post by thebosma on Jul 27, 2021 6:31:30 GMT -6
the beatles wrote better songs but the stones did everything else better so i went with the beatles Yeah? You think The Rolling Stones did “having a Ringo” better? |
|
|
|
Post by neader on Jul 27, 2021 6:44:38 GMT -6
the beatles wrote better songs but the stones did everything else better so i went with the beatles idk i think getting shot is a lot cooler way to die than drowning in a pool. beatles win. |
|
|
|
Post by monasterymonochrome on Jul 27, 2021 7:14:55 GMT -6
So, like, the Beatles are obviously better. But at this point in my life, I'd rather listen to the Stones. Probably just because I've heard all the Beatles songs ad nauseam? So the Stones just sound fresher to me b/c I haven't worn them out yet.
|
|
|
|
Post by thebosma on Jul 27, 2021 7:24:23 GMT -6
So, like, the Beatles are obviously better. But at this point in my life, I'd rather listen to the Stones. Probably just because I've heard all the Beatles songs ad nauseam? So the Stones just sound fresher to me b/c I haven't worn them out yet. Have you watched the McCartney/Rubin thing on Hulu yet? I’ve only watched the first episode but it seems incredibly up your alley. Has me listening to the Beatles again for the first time in a while |
|
|
|
Post by clouddead on Jul 27, 2021 8:45:24 GMT -6
Does Paul talk about the time he saw Jimi Hendrix?
|
|
|
|
Post by venom on Jul 27, 2021 8:50:13 GMT -6
i lean beatles because song-for-song they're stronger. there is something like 10-12 total hours of beatles music. and a lot of it is really good. i love the stones, but there is a lot of junk in their catalog even if i'd much rather listen to them than the beatles almost any day.
|
|
|
|
Post by thebosma on Jul 27, 2021 8:50:22 GMT -6
In the first episode. I almost died laughing
|
|
|
|
Post by alady on Jul 27, 2021 8:52:51 GMT -6
Stones forever. Someday I will write a thesis about how the Beatles never actually broke any new ground and there were countless bands doing what they did so much better at each stage of their career. But not today.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tweet on Jul 27, 2021 8:59:01 GMT -6
Stones forever. Someday I will write a thesis about how the Beatles never actually broke any new ground and there were countless bands doing what they did so much better at each stage of their career. But not today. I thought you were funemployed why *not* today?? |
|
|
|
Post by ten15 on Jul 27, 2021 8:59:37 GMT -6
Stones forever. Someday I will write a thesis about how the Beatles never actually broke any new ground and there were countless bands doing what they did so much better at each stage of their career. But not today. Do you think the Stones broke new ground? Not arguing, just asking. |
|
|
|
Post by alady on Jul 27, 2021 9:01:27 GMT -6
Oh God, no. They're just the better rock band.
|
|
|
|
Post by claypoolfan on Jul 27, 2021 9:08:52 GMT -6
I went with the Stones because I like rock music
|
|
|
|
Post by teekoh on Jul 27, 2021 9:09:02 GMT -6
I grew up listening to the Beatles and my folks didn't listen to a lot of the Stones, so Beatles.
|
|
|
|
Post by alady on Jul 27, 2021 9:09:09 GMT -6
Stones forever. Someday I will write a thesis about how the Beatles never actually broke any new ground and there were countless bands doing what they did so much better at each stage of their career. But not today. I thought you were funemployed why *not* today?? Because I'm going swimming 😊 |
|
|
|
Post by scoots on Jul 27, 2021 9:09:34 GMT -6
i lean beatles because song-for-song they're stronger. there is something like 10-12 total hours of beatles music. and a lot of it is really good. i love the stones, but there is a lot of junk in their catalog even if i'd much rather listen to them than the beatles almost any day. This. |
|
|
|
Post by ten15 on Jul 27, 2021 9:10:13 GMT -6
Oh God, no. They're just the better rock band. I think a lot of the Beatles/Stones differences revolve around whether you prefer Pop bands or Rock (or even jam) bands. The more I see Paul McCartney talk about music - like the clips I have seen of the Rick Rubin doc - the more respect I have for him as a musician. Beatles forever for me. Partially, I think because the longer the Stones released music, the less I cared for it. |
|
|
|
Post by krentist on Jul 27, 2021 9:11:26 GMT -6
The Rolling Stones because they fuck. Beatles are an incel band
|
|
|
|
Post by alady on Jul 27, 2021 9:15:40 GMT -6
Oh God, no. They're just the better rock band. Partially, I think because the longer the Stones released music, the less I cared for it. This is also, I think, where the comparison breaks down, because the Beatles' discography gets to live in a shiny little time capsule, largely unblemished by midlife crises and geriatric performances This thesis is going to be so good |
|
|
|
Post by venom on Jul 27, 2021 9:46:33 GMT -6
Partially, I think because the longer the Stones released music, the less I cared for it. This is also, I think, where the comparison breaks down, because the Beatles' discography gets to live in a shiny little time capsule, largely unblemished by midlife crises and geriatric performances This thesis is going to be so good but you could also say this about anyone who died young. does anyone really believe that janis joplin or otis redding would be nearly as revered if they'd floundered through the 70s/80s putting out absolute dreck like many of their contemporaries? the beatles just made a conscious decision to put a cap on it. |
|
|
|
Post by Pale Hose on Jul 27, 2021 9:49:04 GMT -6
Team Beatles.
|
|
|
|
Post by claypoolfan on Jul 27, 2021 9:55:46 GMT -6
I grew up listening to the Beatles and my folks didn't listen to a lot of the Stones, so Beatles. This is probably the other part of it. My parents fucking looooooove the Stones, would go every time they toured and took me with them as a youth. |
|
|
|
Post by dij22 on Jul 27, 2021 10:00:40 GMT -6
Wings and Solo McCartney over the Stones too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tweet on Jul 27, 2021 10:16:44 GMT -6
That’s a clown take bro
|
|
|
|
Post by alady on Jul 27, 2021 11:04:59 GMT -6
This is also, I think, where the comparison breaks down, because the Beatles' discography gets to live in a shiny little time capsule, largely unblemished by midlife crises and geriatric performances This thesis is going to be so good but you could also say this about anyone who died young. does anyone really believe that janis joplin or otis redding would be nearly as revered if they'd floundered through the 70s/80s putting out absolute dreck like many of their contemporaries? the beatles just made a conscious decision to put a cap on it. Another reason this is not a great comparison. Does quitting while they were still hot make them the better band? |
|
|
|
Post by dij22 on Jul 27, 2021 11:06:25 GMT -6
Wings is probably a top 10 all time band |
|
